Apr 22, 2005
Is The Trainer Trying For A Price
By: Ray Taulbot
The basis of this month’s angle is a step up in entered claiming price following a good
race last start. Most racing fans believe that when a trainer raises his horse in claiming
price it means that he is not sending the horse out to win, much less planning to back its
chances with his own money. But many trainers supplement their incomes by backing
their horses under certain conditions, and these conditions should be a signal to the player also.
Few trainers will lay their own money on the line at odds of less than 4–1, and to increase their
charges’ odds a trainer will often step up a clearly sharp horse in claiming price. As a general
rule, the factor that permits one to distinguish between a sharp horse which has been stepped
up for further conditioning and one that is well-meant and is being stepped up to increase its
odds is the date of its last race.
If a horse is stepped up in claiming price after turning in a good race 20 days ago, it frequently
means the trainer is giving the horse a conditioning race. But if a horse is stepped up no more
than 20 percent higher than its entered price last start and turned in a good race within the
past 12 days, the move generally means the sharp horse is well meant and the trainer is after
a price. In almost all instances, the horse that has raced most recently is the correct choice.
The following rules will guide you when making use of this trainer betting angle:
1) Consider only those horses that are moving up in claiming price today.
2) Eliminate any horse that qualifies on Rule 1 if it was claimed last start.
3) Eliminate any horse that has not started within 12 days; that race having taken place at the
same track as today’s race.
4) Eliminate any remaining horse that has won both of its last two starts.
5) Finally, eliminate any contender that is entered to go more than one furlong farther, or
one furlong less, than the distance it ran last start.
6) After making the above eliminations, any remaining contender that finished in the money last
start is a final contender, provided it is not moving up more than 20 percent in entered claiming
7) Where two or more qualify, choose the horse that has started most recently. If two horses have
raced on the same date, choose the one going off at the highest odds today.
November 11, 2000
6th Meadowlands 6 furlongs
Claiming price $16,000
Zi Pep g.6 $15,000
31Oct00-4Med fst 6f Clm 12,500 5 5 4 1no
13Oct00-2Med fst 6f Clm 12500 5 5 4 36¼
We found a good example in the sixth race at Meadowlands on November 11, 2000. Three
horses — Zi Pep, Pal’s O K, and Rey de Copas — qualified on Rules 1 to 5, but the latter two
starters were moving up more than 20 percent in claiming price.
Note that the entered claiming price is not necessarily the top claiming price of the race. Zi Pep, therefore
was moving up only $2,500 (or 20 percent) in entered claiming price rather than the full $3,500
(28%), which would have disqualified him.
Zi Pep, who had finished in the money in his most recent race and who had not won both of his top
two tries, was a perfect single qualifier. He returned $12.40 to win.
Ties are the exception rather than the rule with this effective angle, and we found other
winners — some at higher payoffs — during the month. Look for these angle plays in future races. u
<< Back To Newsletter