Jun 02, 2006
Distance Change or Distance Switch
By: Ray Taulbot
Almost every month we receive letters from readers asking
substantially the same question, "Can you provide an angle, or combination of angles,
not involving any kind of handicapping that will keep us ahead of the game? We don't mind
waiting for good investments, three or four a week is enough for us, if they win with a
fair consistency at profitable prices."
Yes, we can do this. One cannot expect to get profitable high
payoffs if he insists on avoiding a qualified selection only because it does not measure
up to his standards. Good prices usually result from smart moves on the part of trainers.
All of you know that we are pace handicappers. But we also have
a fair knowledge of racing angles, and we are not above making full use of them,
especially where a good price is involved. In this field, one can't afford to become
dogmatic about anything. We'd never argue that no one can win consistently unless he
confines himself to pace handicapping, although we have found it to be more profitable
than any other means of making selections day in and day out.
When one makes spot selections through the use of angles he will
obtain the best results by employing combination angles, especially those angles that
reveal stable intentions.
One of the most effective trainer angle is the "Switch in
Distance" angle, which is part of the conditioning process. One must, however, be
careful not to confuse this angle with the "Change in Distance" angle. The
latter angle has very little winning power compared to the strength of the switch in
So let's look at two examples to clarify the exact meaning of a
switch in distance. First, let's look at a "Change in Distance." A horse ran six
furlongs last start and today it is entered in a route race. In other words, it is
The "Switch in Distance" angle is entirely different.
Suppose a horse ran six furlongs in its next-to-last race, ran in a route race last
start, and today the horse is entered in a sprint race. In other words, it changed
distances last start and today is switching back to a sprint race. The same move could be
in reverse to the above.
If the horse ran a sprint distance in its next-to-last race and
changed to a route last start, the change in distance was made as a means of legging-up
the horse's stamina so that it is not likely to be short next start in a sprint race. When
the situation is reversed, that is, when the horse ran in a route race in its next-to-last
start, and changed to a sprint last time out, the change in distance was made to sharpen
up the router's speed, which will contribute to its effort next start in a route race.
So you see, there is nothing mysterious about the switch in
distance angle, it is simply a part of the training procedure.
Now what angle is likely to prove most effective in conjunction
with the switch in distance angle? The answer is one that offers additional evidence that
the horse is well meant today. Thus, a drop in claiming price or class today is the factor
that, when combined with the switch in distance angle, produces the highest percentage of
winners, often at good prices.
Why does this combination of angles usually result in profitable
prices? Because in many instances the trainer will step his horse up in claiming price or
class when he changes distance. As a result, the horse will seldom show anything like a
good race last start. Therefore, with little or no evidence of current sharpness or good
form, the drop in claiming price today is seldom enough to attract heavy public support.
The result is usually a good price.
A drop in class is obvious in claiming races as are moves which
involve switching from claiming to allowance and back again. However, there is no way for
the average racing fan to know the exact conditions of an allowance race from the past
Since we have no sure way of telling whether or not class drops
or hikes have occurred in allowance races, we will just assume that the trainer knows his
business and let the distance switch alone control the play and price. Therefore, an
otherwise qualified horse that shows races in allowance events in its last two starts and
which is running in an allowance event today is acceptable.
Purse values can be compared to the purse value of today's race,
but this comparison s not conclusive.
The date angle is another device that is highly effective when
it pertains to horses that qualify on the combination trainer angle. This is because a
trainer who has a horse ready is most anxious to get him into a suitable race as soon as
possible after its last conditioning race. Trainers know that to keep a horse idle too
long after it has been prepared could result in a performance below what the trainer
We have found over the years that horses qualifying on the above
combination angle win more frequently when they come back within 14 days after their last
race. By confining the date factor to 14 days, the player can increase the winning
percentage of this combination angle. However, he is very likely to encounter a qualified
horse that has been idle as long as 21 days which connects at a good price.
Our advice is to stick to 14 days. Beyond that time limit, we
require the horse be given at least one workout since its last race and that the odds on
such a horse be no less than 15-1.
As an example, we have selected the seventh race at Philadelphia
on April 11. Here are the pertinent past performance information on the colt Saratoga
6-1/2 furlongs Claiming
Saratoga Wave c 3 $14,000
29 Mar 94 9 Pha 1-70 Alw 14500 5181/4
21 Feb 94 2 Pha 6f Clm 11000 23/4
When the trainer switched Saratoga Wave to a route race, and
moved him up to an allowance, on March 29, he ran out-of-the-money by 18-1/4 lengths. When
returned to a sprint and dropped in class to another claimer today, he returned $24.80 to
Don't use this combination angle in the belief that every
selection is a sure winner. However, the winning percentage is good and the prices more
than make up for the losers one is sure to get from time to time
<< Back To Newsletter